Betting Advice
    • Betting advice
    • Football
    • NFL
      • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • MMA
    • More
      • Boxing
      • Cricket
      • Cycling
      • Golf
      • Horse Racing
      • Formula 1
      • NASCAR
      • Rugby
    Betting Advice
    Home»NFL»Mularkey’s revelation has NFL looking shady, again
    NFL

    Mularkey’s revelation has NFL looking shady, again

    April 8, 2022No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The most damning testimonial about the distorted adherence to the NFL’s Rooney Rule went unnoticed for nearly 18 months.

    Lost in the abyss of COVID-related football coverage — nestled in the middle of a “Steelers Realm” podcast in October of 2020 — former NFL head coach Mike Mularkey took a familiar allegation about the Rooney Rule and told a story about it from a completely unfamiliar vantage. He provided the viewpoint of the guy who actually got the top job in 2016, and the regret that ensued because he believed the process was a lie.

    That’s what Mularkey tried to tell everyone in 2020. That the spirit of the Rooney Rule was abused. That he had firsthand knowledge of it. And that it was a top-down problem of complicity, starting with Tennessee Titans ownership and extending to general manager Jon Robinson.

    Somehow, we missed this bomb. Now the Brian Flores lawsuit against the NFL — alleging racial discrimination in hiring practices — has rediscovered it. It’s a damning turn for the NFL, who now has to contend with a former head coach who landed his top job in 2016, then framed it as a “fake hiring process” that considered minority coaching candidates simply to check a box.

    The suggestion of this kind of Rooney Rule distortion isn’t new. But a former head coach like Mularkey expressing contrition for being a silent accomplice to it certainly is. That should have the NFL worried. Not only because Flores isn’t alone anymore in his class-action lawsuit (Steve Wilks and Ray Horton have joined as plaintiffs) but also because the league never could have imagined dealing with this Mularkey revelation. Not once in Rooney Rule history has a head coach said he got a job without the other candidates getting a fair shake. Enter Mularkey in 2020, answering a remarkably broad question in a specific and personal way.

    NASHVILLE, TN - DECEMBER 24: Head Coach Mike Mularkey of the Tennessee Titans in a game against the Los Angeles Rams at Nissan Stadium on December 24, 2017 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Photo by Wesley Hitt/Getty Images)
    Mike Mularkey called the Titans’ 2016 coaching search, which ended with him getting the job, a “fake hiring process.” (Photo by Wesley Hitt/Getty Images)

    Here’s how the query went:

    “Would there be anything during your coaching career that you might have done differently or changed?”

    “That’s a good question,” Mularkey said. “I’ll tell you guys this: I’ve always prided myself on doing the right thing in this business and I can’t say that’s true about everybody in this business. It’s a very cutthroat business and a lot of guys will tell you that. But I allowed myself at one point when I was in Tennessee to get caught up in something I regret. I still regret it. But the ownership there, Amy Adams-Strunk and her family, came in and told me I was going to be the head coach in 2016, before they went through the Rooney Rule. And so, I sat there knowing I was the head coach in ’16 as they went through this fake hiring process — knowing a lot of the coaches that they were interviewing, knowing how much they prepared to go through those interviews, knowing that everything they could do and they had no chance of getting that job. Actually, the GM, Jon Robinson, he was in on the interview with me. He had no idea why he was interviewing me — that I had the job already.”

    Mularkey went on:

    “I regret [it], because I pride myself in my kids first, to do the right thing. I always said that to the players. And here I am, the head guy, not doing it. I’ve regretted that since then. It was the wrong thing to do. I’m sorry I did that. But it was not the way to go about it. I should have interviewed like everybody else and got hired because of the interview, not early on. That’s probably my biggest regret.”

    This isn’t the kind of thing a coach typically says on a podcast. It’s the kind of answer offered in a sealed deposition that takes place under oath. That probably tells you a little about how long Mularkey must have been carrying this around.

    Making that kind of allegation is no small thing, particularly when you’re basically implicating yourself as being a passive participant.

    For Flores’ legal camp, that’s the stuff of dreams. Maybe it’s admissible in court or maybe it’s not, but it certainly stands to reason that if Mularkey was willing to state it once as a podcast guest, he’d be willing to do it a second time as a contrite witness in a courtroom. And even if that’s not the case, the public perception of the moment is inescapable. It’s proof of concept that some NFL hires are already locked up before the process even begins. And that the Rooney Rule became a tool used for optics and shielding.

    NFL teams had long been suspected of staging “sham” interviews with minority candidates to satisfy the rule, essentially checking off a box that stood in the way of hiring a white head coach. Never had it been aired out in a way that illustrated the theory from each side of that checked box — completing a three-dimensional perspective between minority candidates who suspected they were being used, to white counterparts who might have suspected (or even known) the job was theirs from the start.

    Mularkey filled in a long-missing piece of that picture. It’s a fact that resulted in the Titans effectively calling him a liar Thursday.

    “Our 2016 head coach search was a thoughtful and competitive process fully in keeping with NFL guidelines and our own organizational values,” the Titans said in a statement. “We conducted detailed, in-person interviews with four talented individuals, two of whom were diverse candidates. No decision was made, and no decision was communicated, prior to the completion of all interviews. While we are proud of Our Commitment to Diversity, we are dedicated to continued growth as an organization to foster diversity and inclusion in our workplace and community.”

    It’s worth noting that Mularkey made his statement to “Steelers Realm” nearly 16 months before Flores’ lawsuit emerged. He rolled out arguably the most massive Rooney Rule grenade to date at a time when it would arguably reflect on only himself. And he did it in a way that made him a part of the problem, while answering a question that wasn’t specific to how NFL teams run their hiring processes.

    All of which seems pretty weird. People don’t just fall on a sword for no reason, especially in the NFL and most especially when nobody seems to know that you’ve been complicit in something. Mularkey did exactly that. With zero tangible benefit to himself.

    That’s a statement unto itself. And it’s one the NFL is going to have to take seriously.

    This article was originally published by Yahoo.com. Read the original article here.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    NFL draft Day 2 winners and losers

    April 30, 2022

    Did Vegas inspire NFL teams to bet big?

    April 29, 2022

    2022 NFL draft the ‘least predictable of all time’

    April 27, 2022

    Final 2022 NFL mock draft: Waiting on QBs

    April 27, 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Signup for our Newsletter
    Advert
    NBA

    NBA playoff schedule: Second-round matchups, dates, game times and TV info

    April 30, 2022

    Will Grizzlies be able to hang with Warriors?

    April 30, 2022

    Jason Kidd gives Mavs magic playoff touch

    April 29, 2022

    Bucks-Celtics series should be a slugfest

    April 28, 2022
    NHL

    Can Hurricanes get over the hump vs. Bruins?

    April 30, 2022

    Handing out some NHL hardware

    April 29, 2022

    Detroit Red Wings vs. New Jersey Devils: TV channel, radio, game info

    April 29, 2022

    Do Kings have any shot against Oilers?

    April 28, 2022
    NFL

    NFL draft Day 2 winners and losers

    April 30, 2022

    Did Vegas inspire NFL teams to bet big?

    April 29, 2022

    2022 NFL draft the ‘least predictable of all time’

    April 27, 2022

    Final 2022 NFL mock draft: Waiting on QBs

    April 27, 2022
    Categories
    • Betting advice
    • Boxing
    • Cricket
    • Cycling
    • Football
    • Formula 1
    • Golf
    • Horse Racing
    • MLB
    • MMA
    • NASCAR
    • NBA
    • NCAAF
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Rugby
    • Tennis
    Archives
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • May 2018
    • December 2017
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • November 2015
    • June 2015
    • March 2015
    Signup for our Newsletter
    Advert
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Cookie Policy (US)
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    © 2022 Designed and Powered by JL Digital webbyrå.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}