Betting Advice
    • Betting advice
    • Football
    • NFL
      • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • MMA
    • More
      • Boxing
      • Cricket
      • Cycling
      • Golf
      • Horse Racing
      • Formula 1
      • NASCAR
      • Rugby
    Betting Advice
    Home»NCAAF»Supreme Court skeptical, hesitant in NCAA case
    NCAAF

    Supreme Court skeptical, hesitant in NCAA case

    March 31, 2021No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Attempting to predict a U.S. Supreme Court decision based on the tone and tenacity of the questions that justices ask attorneys during oral arguments has proven to be a fruitless exercise since, well, about 1789. It’s always best to assume nothing.

    So who knows what the nine current justices will decide in NCAA v. Alston — a case that boils down to, in the most general of descriptions, whether college athletes can be paid above and beyond their currently allotted scholarship. A decision won’t be rendered for months, likely sometime in June.

    That said, the morning couldn’t have been too pleasant for NCAA attorney Seth Waxman, who got waxed by a slew of justices during Wednesday’s 90-minute session.

    Liberals, conservatives and everyone in between sounded extremely skeptical as they listened to the NCAA’s defense of amateurism, which was full of time-honored and eye roll-inducing tropes from Waxman such as: “If you allow [athletes] to be paid, they will be spending even more time on their athletics and even less time on academics.”

    Never mind the NCAA “bubbling” a combined 132 men’s and women’s basketball teams far from their campuses so they could fulfill lucrative television contracts. Nothing wrong with that — it’s what the players want as well — but let’s not pretend it was done in the interest of academics. This is business. Always.

    The NCAA’s essential argument is that fans of college sports like that the players aren’t paid and therefore allowing them to be paid would adversely impact the popularity and profitability of the enterprise. Basically, we should continue to do this because we’ve always done this and it’s worked well for us and some people like it.

    The justices hated that.

    “You can only ride on the history, Mr. Waxman, for so long,” Justice Elena Kagan said. “… I guess it doesn’t move me all that much that there’s a history to this, if what is going on now is that competitors, as to labor, are combining to fix prices.”

    The Supreme Court didn't seem to like the NCAA's arguments in defense of its amateurism on Wednesday. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
    The Supreme Court didn’t seem to like the NCAA’s arguments in defense of its amateurism on Wednesday. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

    Added Justice Brett Kavanaugh: “It does seem … the schools are conspiring with competitors, agreeing with competitors, to pay no salaries to the workers who are making the schools billions of dollars on the theory that consumers want the schools to pay their workers nothing. And that just seems entirely circular and even somehwat disturbing.”

    Kagan was nominated for the Supreme Court by President Obama. Kavanaugh by President Trump. When you’re getting hammered by both of them …

    Yet despite all of that, there are no guarantees. As bold as the justices were in systematically picking apart Waxman’s arguments, they also expressed a hesitancy to make a ruling that might blow college athletics into something unrecognizable.

    Somewhat understandably, no one seems to want to look back and realize that their decision — even if it’s the right thing to do and rooted in law — somehow caused a ripple effect that killed off March Madness, or even a bunch of non-revenue sports somewhere.

    “How do we know we aren’t destroying the game as it is?” Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked.

    “This is a tough case for me … because it’s a unique product and it brings joy to a lot of people,” Justice Stephen Breyer said. “I worry about judges getting into the business of how amateur sports should be run.”

    Whether such thinking should even be a consideration is a question unto itself. Still, it’s worth acknowledging that as important as this issue is to some, by Supreme Court standards, it isn’t much.

    Allowing players to make a little extra money off their Instagram feed or TikTok account (which is how the vast majority will be impacted) isn’t some clear and present danger. Conversely, innocent people are unlikely to perish if some college athletes are limited to tuition, room and board.

    Even the most vocal proponent for player compensation has to acknowledge that it, as well as allowing players to profit off their name, image and likeness, will be messy and unpredictable. Gloriously messy to those who believe in free markets, but messy still.

    “It’s like a game of Jenga,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. “You’ve got this nice solid block that protects the sort of product the schools want to provide, and you pull out one log and then another and everything’s fine, then another and another and all of a sudden the whole thing … comes crashing down.”

    If nothing else, Wednesday morning showed how decades of ineffective leadership — both at the NCAA, in conference offices and on campus — have left college sports prone. Rather than evolve, compromise and change with the times, college sports has clung to the status quo via lawyers, lobbying and scare tactics. (Competitive balance! Academics!)

    Now the future is in the hands of nine justices who are likely more focused on the “Rule of Reason” and the Sherman Antitrust Act than whether or not paying players will really impact recruiting. (Here’s a solid prediction: It’ll do the opposite of what the NCAA says and actually spread the talent out more, not less.)

    At the same time, state houses, courtrooms and perhaps even the United States Congress are hashing through name, image and likeness issues.

    Basically, the NCAA did nothing for so long, it’s handed the steering wheel over to politicians, lobbyists and jurists. They just punted it all away. It’s a disastrous way to run a business. Yet here we are, their lawyer getting so scalded by Supreme Court justices that the NCAA’s chief hope for victory is that the court is too scared to act.

    “Antitrust laws should not be a cover for exploitation of the student-athletes,” Kavanaugh said.

    Sure. But will anyone do anything about it?

    More from Yahoo Sports:

    This article was originally published by Yahoo.com. Read the original article here.
    Cryptocurrency wallet
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Florida Atlantic Owls Preview 2022: Season Prediction, Breakdown, Key Games, Players

    May 20, 2022

    Why Saban’s accusations are earth-shaking

    May 19, 2022

    College football divisions are about to be history

    May 18, 2022

    Former Washington star Lincoln Kennedy shares his ‘nerve-wracking’ NFL Draft day story

    April 30, 2022
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Signup for our Newsletter
    Advert
    Managed Wordpress Hosting
    NBA

    Smart proving to be Celtics’ leader on and off court

    May 20, 2022

    Warriors keep flexing on playoff opponents

    May 19, 2022

    How are the Warriors going to handle Luka?

    May 16, 2022

    NBA playoff schedule: Second-round matchups, dates, game times and TV info

    April 30, 2022
    NHL

    Lightning beat buzzer for stunning win

    May 20, 2022

    How can the NHL’s top offenses be slowed down?

    May 19, 2022

    Why Rangers-Canes series may be a surprising gem

    May 17, 2022

    Can Hurricanes get over the hump vs. Bruins?

    April 30, 2022
    NFL

    Dolphins QB Tua Tagovailoa has 19th-best odds to win NFL MVP award

    May 20, 2022

    Why Browns may still want Baker

    May 20, 2022

    All Watson trials poised to be delayed until 2023

    May 17, 2022

    NFL draft Day 2 winners and losers

    April 30, 2022
    Categories
    • Betting advice
    • Boxing
    • Cricket
    • Cycling
    • Football
    • Formula 1
    • Golf
    • Horse Racing
    • MLB
    • MMA
    • NASCAR
    • NBA
    • NCAAF
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Rugby
    • Tennis
    Archives
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • May 2018
    • December 2017
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • November 2015
    • June 2015
    • March 2015
    Signup for our Newsletter
    Advert
    Managed Wordpress Hosting
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Cookie Policy (US)
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    © 2022 Designed and Powered by JL Digital webbyrå.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}